Click on the titles of work below to view
Cathy’s poem “Out-of-Body” is in the anthology Dionne’s Story: Volume 3 (Madwomen In the Attic) October 2022
I keep my eyes open so I can not see.
My viewfinder in nightmares sees
moonlit bodies stumbling in the surf
laughing slapping not seeing her
back slashed pink by scruffy beach.
She screams wide her vocal cords crimped
as if grit of littered boardwalk will rise to protect.
My lips part to assist. Sand hears as well
as any human ear waning pleas for help.
She kicks leaden stumps useless legs like mine
bound in sheets paralyzed unable to shove
bodies off. Hips rise in self-disgust
to bottles some plastic some glass.
Moonlit green is pretty and brutal.
My own hands draw blood in clammy flesh
clawed weapons of self-defense
that cannot protect her face.
My groggy head too heavy to lift.
I open numb lips to the taste of blood
in crescents carved on her face
by scores of jeering teeth.
Each a copycat each a coward hiding
behind eyelids my own.
Rumors Secrets & Lies, Anhinga Press 2022 features Work to Do and Sex, Drugs and Alcohol
Sisters Twisting Beatitudes, Psaltery and Lyre
Cathy’s poem “Out-of-Body” is forthcoming in Dionne’s Story: Volume 3 and will be read at Survivor Speakout on 5 April.
Article in The Writer’s Chronicle February 2022 Where Do You Get A Poetic License to Infringe Copyright?
Where Do You Get A Poetic License to Infringe Copyright?
Where Do You Get a Poetic License to Infringe Copyright?
Cathy Wittmeyer | February 2022
Poetic license is defined by Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary as, “license, or liberty, taken by a poet, prose writer, or other artist in deviating from rule, conventional form, logic, or fact, in order to produce a desired effect.” The deviated rule this essay investigates is copyright infringement in derivative works. The question was raised by a poet in a Tweet, “Is it okay to use song lyrics in a poem?” and I patiently watched poets comment with all sorts of justifications that were less than legally precise. I propose that it can be perfectly fine to borrow music lyrics for a poem, or a line from another poem without permission. It can also be wrong to do so and poses risks poets and publishers may not want to undertake.
The Copyright Act of 1976 gets its power from the First Amendment, and its intent is to encourage the building upon the ideas of others and the free exchange of ideas by creating incentive to share. It is the expression, not the idea, of the originator that is protected. According to the United States Copyright Office (Circular 14), the owner of a copyright is the only one who has the right to adapt their work or authorize someone else to, but some fair use exceptions do exist. Fair use is a defense against a charge of copyright infringement. There is no reason for a poet to use the fair use defense unless they are being sued. Poets might simply ask what the risk of being sued is before they borrow lines and make their choices based on their level of risk aversion.
The Copyright Act of 1976 gets its power from the First Amendment, and its intent is to encourage the building upon the ideas of others and the free exchange of ideas by creating incentive to share.
As with all legal exceptions, there is a legal test, a set of questions one must ask to determine whether using someone else’s line of lyric is fair use without permission. These have been developed over decades of cases, and a defendent needs to take steps to prove the use was fair: the nature of the work, the significance of the copied content, and the potential impact to the copyright owner’s income and reputation.
A poet who claims poetic license to use someone else’s line or lines without permission, must meet this very subjective test if they are sued for using the material without permission. A poet cannot simply say they meet the test to avoid a legal challenge so must take the first step and consider the nature of the derivative work: is it newsworthy, parody or comedy, and therefore, transformative art? If it is a poem, it is probably art, and not reportage or parody. If, however, it is paying homage to a great poet and also creating something new in tribute, we could have a case for fair use in the first step, and could then move on to the second and third steps.
Take for example, a poem with the title, “Wind” that has the epigraph, after Bob Dylan, and each line is a lyric from different Dylan songs arranged in a cento. This cento is a new transformative piece of work, follows a known formula that took skill and labor on the part of the poet, and gives credit to the original copyright owner. It might pass the first step.
Second, look at the significance of the copied content in the derivative work. It has to be enough that the original copyrighted material is still recognizable within it. If a line of music is placed within a poem such that the average reader doesn’t recognize the original song, then maybe it is not enough of a borrowing to bother with. For example, a line that uses the words, “like a rolling stone,” might not be recognizable as Bob Dylan’s without any other context or borrowed lyrics. Pair that with more Dylan in, “the answer is blowing in the wind like a rolling stone,” and a problem arises. The cento example in Step 1 might easily have failed this test if only because it relies on the recognition of Bob Dylan’s lyrics to make its effect.
…poets cannot rely on the assumption that because poetry doesn’t pay financially, it is always fair use to quote another poet, writer, or musician whose copyright has not passed into the public domain without getting the originator’s blessing.
And now, the third test asks what would be the impact of a poem using a line from a Dylan song printed in a poetry journal on the income or reputation of Bob Dylan. This test is only relevant if the poet’s fair use was taken in the entirety of all the steps. Dylan just sold his entire songwriting catalog to Universal for more than 300 million dollars. The financial/reputational impact of a single poem on a giant record label would be even more questionable than its potential to harm Bob Dylan’s reputation or the market for his work. I question, honestly, who would sue a poet for damages even if harm could be established.
While it wouldn’t seem worth the effort to sue a poet, I will add a fourth question for the simple poet contemplating great things for their poetry: what are their intentions for one day publishing this work? When a small journal obtains initial copyright to their single poem, they may not see any backlash from the original copyright owner, whom they borrow from. However, if their poem becomes part of a book manuscript, the publishing house is a bigger target for a copyright infringement lawsuit, and they might shy away from the controversy no matter how fair the poet’s use of the material is. It is the subjectivity of judge and/or jury that makes publishers skeptical about derivative works without permission.
On the one hand, poets cannot rely on the assumption that because poetry doesn’t pay financially, it is always fair use to quote another poet, writer, or musician whose copyright has not passed into the public domain without getting the originator’s blessing. On the other hand, poets must, in their creative process, trust that their transformation of another artist’s work has been stamped with their own originality. If poets pay tribute to those from whom they borrow for the sole purpose of creating new art, they can feel safe that their derivative works are fair use. Sadly, poets who want to be published are subject to the willingness of the publisher to defend a copyright infringement lawsuit. Robert Zimmerman is well known to have “borrowed”—though “geniuses steal”—from folk songs, musicals, and movies in both his music and lyrics (even taking his last name from Dylan Thomas). This is a poetic license all artists rely on—publishers be damned.
Cathy Wittmeye earned her JD from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and her MFA in Poetry from Carlow University. She is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar Association since 2005. cathywittmeyer.com
The Stop Sign and Sex, Drugs and Alcohol , They Call Us
Crow Island Offering, The Page Gallery
Curse Words, the tiny journal
Thrill-Seekers, Tangled Locks Journal
They Will Kill Us (pg. 46-47), Bood of Matches
It Has No End, Funicular Magazine
Possession, Selected for an honorable mention in the Difficult Fruit Poetry Prize in 2018. ITHACALIT Poetry
A Night at the Paradise Motel, Somewhere, California and Wow, Plants and Poetry
Raising Anchor, Seratonin
knotted, a chapbook, was selected as a finalist in the 2020 Broken River Prize by Platypus Press
Paper Baby, appeared in Show Us Your Papers, a Poetry Anthology, Main Street Rag
At Breakfast, When He Turned Twelve, My Son Asked About His Birth
The whole sky cracked
like a soft-boiled egg
smacked against the table
on a Sunday morning.
The puckering floor
crumpled and fell away
beneath my feet.
hours before time
& I fell
sailing softly on air
& you were there
just like that
asking me to breathe again
such sweet molecules
my lungs never knew.
a waterfall slowly,
that slid over my sandy tongue
& down my dusty throat
to circle around my tired heart
where yours beat a tympani
to my bass
& the space that held us
filled with symphonic percussion
awaiting the strings to strike their bows
at the moment your tiny nails pierced
my skin until my ears forgot both
the clash and the silence.
I sank into the darkness of your gaze
for a count the conductor lost too:
a quiet you and I will never
Appeared in the Poet’s Choice anthology, For Expecting Mothers, 2020
This poem appeared in The Esthetic Apostle, May 2019.
Visit Norderney…sooner…for the storms that batter this island are constantly reshaping the landscape. – traveler.com
You should have brought a windbreaker, child – no, woman.
You smell the softness of iodine on the breeze that intensifies
cold sand on your soles until the breaking rays
blind and burn the glare of your porcelain shoulder
as fragile as the rainbow mussels’ shards piercing
such tender feet oblivious to their luminescence.
Low sweeps and mourning shrieks of gulls
draw your eye to a washed-up Tern stranded
on the basalt Buhne headless, and to a misty white
that disappears where the obsidian rolls choppy.
This is neap tide when pulls of celestial bodies
work against each other. Seagulls tossed
in reverse-glides upward, resign to new aims.
Sand, like blizzard ice, pelts skin, chafes.
Grass whips chaste flesh, smarting, drawing blood.
Inky black spills into the milky turmoil of white caps
like salt abrading our lips as we dash behind
saddened glass that pleads to come inside too
– knocking – pounding – whining.
An enveloping dome of charcoal-blue frames the deck flags
held back on poles like violent boyfriends they cannot escape
no matter how fast they run. And the bluster
abruptly stops with the warm return of Sun.
I brought you to the sea today to calm our nerves.
I failed to consider the island weather’s temperament.
Work to Do
“Work to Do” first appeared in issue 2.54 of Noble Gas Quarterly, December 2018. This is a revised version.
I like to think he was swimming in pure amniotic fluid
—save the champagne that first night.
I kept his space pristine: no wine, no lattes, no 2nd-hand smoke.
I like to think of him on our first escape to the sea – the Priel –
his toddled footprints in foamy morning sand where, in the shallows,
I blew in his face, so he held his breath, submerged and swam.
I like to think I leave him swimming in the purest atoms of H and O
breathing air that is trusted breath absent soot and acidic mist.
Instead, I leave him the task of cleansing it
without the tools to do it.
I leave him beaches awash in medical waste
& honeybees choking on pesticides
I leave him molten roads in scorching heat
I leave him flames performing seed serotiny
I leave him instead, with work to do.
Peeling Bark Floats Silver and Papery
If I write a poem about watching fire catch a log in my fireplace,
will you say the fire is not fire and the log is something else?
If I describe how flames tickled their way to the log’s dead heart,
will you tell me it is a desire to fill a void afraid to be named?
If I tell you the log is a volcano whose fire explodes from within,
will you call my metaphor repressed sexual energy or poetic anxiety?
If I describe peeling birch bark silver and papery floating out the flue,
will you tell me my consciousness of passing time has entered the poem?
If I tell you that smoke is churning out a crevice and spinning like Dorothy Hamill,
will you say time is of the essence, so write, write, write, and stop complaining?
If I write the kindling turned to coals that would fill a Florida sunset with envy,
will you tell me to stop being jealous of other poets and find my own voice?
And if I tell you when I stoked this fire, it roared in my face,
will you say I should turn my questions into statements?
I just sat down to look at the fire, but a fire always has an opinion.
I cannot persuade myself that a beneficent and omnipotent God would have designedly created the (wasp). – Charles Darwin
Waning summer, Fruit sweet fermentation.
Your preference – flesh – meat – protein.
Admiration. Yellow-masked feminist.
Corseted dominatrix. Fertilization upon
Request. Determine your progeny’s sex.
Sting in frenzy at your sisters’ distress.
Heroines wearing yellow jerseys.
Catherine de Medici. Victoria. Polaire.
Laces, ivory, wood, whalebone, horn.
Fabricated diminutive corps.
Petiole between leaf and stem.
Precarious bridge. Vital suspension.
Papery brother of working girls.
I swat one into fetal curl,
as they invade my home, my place of rest.
Pheromones wake the wasps’ nest.